Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Happy (Belated) Mother's Day!
First of all, I would like to wish a very happy Mother's Day to all of the moms out there, especially those who support our movement to lower the drinking age. And yes, there are plenty of them indeed.
Recently, I have been reflecting on the utter lack of diversity in our movement, most notably the fact that our movement is largely a sausage-fest for the most part. And most of the women in our movement tend to be younger and tend to be non-mothers. That is in no small part due to groups like MADD effectively monopolizing the issue and claiming to speak for all mothers, while those mothers who openly support lowering the drinking age are often viciously shamed for taking such a stance. It is also the result of our movement unfortunately having a tendency to be at least somewhat androcentric, which then attracts more men than women, which makes it even more androcentric, and so on. And that needs to change yesterday if we wish to make any sort of progress. It was after all, women, and especially mothers, who were the main driving force for repealing Prohibition in 1933. And the recent victories on cannabis legalization did not happen until more and more mothers were willing to stand up and be counted. Witness, for example, the group known as "Moms for Marijuana". Yes, you read that right--something that would have been unthinkable just ten years ago. And our movement needs to do the same as well.
We at Twenty-One Debunked propose the creation of a mothers' group to act as a counterweight to MADD. It could be called "Mothers for Responsibility", for example. At the same time, us fellas in the movement need to remove all remaining traces of androcentrism in our movement and effectively make it more gynocentric as well. We need to take women's issues much more seriously. With no apologies to MRAs, PUAs, MGTOWs, and other "manosphere" types who frankly need to be kicked off the island, so to speak. Ditto for brocialists, manarchists, and (worst of all) macktivists--if you don't know what any of those are are, feel free to Google them. And as readers may have noticed from our recent posts, Twenty-One Debunked (as well as the TSAP) is certainly evolving in the right direction as we speak.
Recently, I have been reflecting on the utter lack of diversity in our movement, most notably the fact that our movement is largely a sausage-fest for the most part. And most of the women in our movement tend to be younger and tend to be non-mothers. That is in no small part due to groups like MADD effectively monopolizing the issue and claiming to speak for all mothers, while those mothers who openly support lowering the drinking age are often viciously shamed for taking such a stance. It is also the result of our movement unfortunately having a tendency to be at least somewhat androcentric, which then attracts more men than women, which makes it even more androcentric, and so on. And that needs to change yesterday if we wish to make any sort of progress. It was after all, women, and especially mothers, who were the main driving force for repealing Prohibition in 1933. And the recent victories on cannabis legalization did not happen until more and more mothers were willing to stand up and be counted. Witness, for example, the group known as "Moms for Marijuana". Yes, you read that right--something that would have been unthinkable just ten years ago. And our movement needs to do the same as well.
We at Twenty-One Debunked propose the creation of a mothers' group to act as a counterweight to MADD. It could be called "Mothers for Responsibility", for example. At the same time, us fellas in the movement need to remove all remaining traces of androcentrism in our movement and effectively make it more gynocentric as well. We need to take women's issues much more seriously. With no apologies to MRAs, PUAs, MGTOWs, and other "manosphere" types who frankly need to be kicked off the island, so to speak. Ditto for brocialists, manarchists, and (worst of all) macktivists--if you don't know what any of those are are, feel free to Google them. And as readers may have noticed from our recent posts, Twenty-One Debunked (as well as the TSAP) is certainly evolving in the right direction as we speak.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It's good that more women support lowering the drinking age to 18. Our movement should remove any androcentric elements in the movement so that we may be more of a counterweight against MADD and supporters of the ageist drinking age.
ReplyDeleteDo we even have a movement to speak of? CR has transformed into a useless piece of fat. NYRA is concentrating on lowering the voting age to 16. We have to rebuild the movement ASAFP!
ReplyDeleteIndeed, our movement really needs to be revived yesterday.
ReplyDelete