- Tobacco and nicotine age limits would remain at 18 in all but a very few states which are 19. But many states choose to put a reasonable cap on the quantities that 18-20 year olds can purchase (per transaction, and only one transaction per day), to discourage them from giving or selling to their friends under 18.
- Cannabis is legalized in mostly the same states in both timelines (though a somewhat greater number of states do so in the alternate timeline), but all who do so choose 18 or 19 as their age limits, nearly always matching their drinking and smoking ages. And like tobacco, most states choose to limit the quantities that 18-20 year olds can purchase per transaction and per day, and for the same reasons.
- And the federal government FINALLY gets around to legalizing it as well by 2024 if not sooner, with a federal age limit of 18 for cannabis sales (but no limit for use or possession) to match the tobacco sales age limit that still remains in effect. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Cannabis, Firearms, and Explosives and the FDA both have joint (pun intended) authority to enforce it on vendors.
- Alcohol taxes (and prices) in the USA are somewhat higher as a rule in the alternate timeline, though still not nearly as high as in Canada. Thus, in nearly all states, the typical six-pack of beer costs about a dollar or two more in 2025 dollars. Likewise, the typical gallon of wine and the average liter of hard liquor also costs an extra dollar or two more in the alternate timeline. Some states also experiment with "minimum unit pricing" (MUP) as well, but most states still only prohibit selling "below cost."
- In 2019, instead of raising the tobacco sales age to 21, which there is virtually zero appetite for, the feds instead decided to implement the Mark Kleiman's idea to raise the federal cigarette and other combustible tobacco taxes to $5/pack or the equivalent amount of tobacco, BUT allowing states and localities to fully rebate it against their own tobacco-specific taxes. Result? Low-tax states states raise and largely equalize their taxes with high-tax ones, smoking rates plummet for all ages (especially among youth), and the interstate smuggling black market dries up. Win-win-win for everyone except Big Tobacco and their sycophantic lackeys.
- Vaping products have their nicotine levels capped by the FDA at the same levels as the EU, UK, and Israel, most flavors are banned, and ingredients are better regulated as of 2019. The "vaping epidemic" slows to a crawl.
- The drinking age of 18 (or 19, or split) is very strictly enforced on vendors and servers. For young drinkers themselves, underage drinking is illegal but decriminalized in nearly every state by now. It is typically treated like a minor traffic violation or parking ticket.
- While a few bars and clubs here and there set their own age limits of 21 or higher to enter, such examples remain few and far between, and are looked upon with disdain by most Americans. And for places like Dave and Busters, or really any other businesses for that matter, it would literally never even occur to the managers to set any age limits higher than 18, if even that high at all. Such baseless age segregation remains well outside the Overton window in the alternate timeline.
- Without that specious quick fix in their toolkit, they instead implement a zero tolerance policy for fighting, vandalism, theft, and disorderly conduct of any kind, strictly enforced. And they are NOT KIDDING!
- It remains rare for any hotels or motels to refuse anyone over 18 due to age. Ditto for most cruise ships as well.
- Drunk driving is taken very, very seriously for people of all ages, and increasingly tough laws are increasingly strictly enforced. The same goes for drug-impaired driving as well.
- Most states by now set the BAC limit at 0.05%, but anything below 0.08% is usually a traffic violation instead of a criminal offense. (New York only has to add two words, per se, to their existing but currently underappreciated 0.05% law, by the way.). And Zero Tolerance laws exist as well, albeit usually based on how long one has had their driver's license rather than age alone. And for ALL drivers, the limit is now 0.00% if one is driving recklessly.
- Social host liability laws, while existing in some places in limited form, never really seem to catch on in most of the USA. Most people think such laws are insane and un-American in the alternate timeline.
- The combination of the lack of a 21 drinking age and lack of social host laws results in somewhat more in-person socialization between young people, and between generations, in the alternate timeline compared to the current timeline.
- Block parties make a comeback, or more accurately, never really went away.
- America is still very much a car culture either way, but "safe rider" programs are far more common in the alternate timeline. And slowly but surely, at least some improvements are finally being made in public transportation.
- America's drinking culture still leaves a lot to be desired, much like in the rest of the Anglosphere, but over time it becomes at least somewhat healthier and less extreme overall.
- Certainly the college drinking culture is much safer and healthier in the alternate timeline, even though it is often just as wild. The wildness peaks during and shortly after "frosh week" at the beginning of freshman year, getting it largely out of their systems early on, after which students tend to buckle down and study a bit more and keep the partying in it's proper place in their list of priorities, certainly by the time midterms roll around. Especially since all of the major universities have finally decided to tackle the grade inflation that had been building for decades.
- Many colleges and universities even have bars and pubs on campus, sometimes even in the dorms.
- Fraternities and sororities, while they still exist, largely wither on the vine as they have become increasingly obsolete, except for the more academic and service-oriented ones.
- High school, contrary to what some may fear, is NOT radically different between the two timelines, and in many ways improved. Drinking and "binge" drinking rates are both at most a couple of percentage points higher (if at all) in the alternate timeline for grade 12, mostly due to greater honesty in surveys (which are always taken with at least a grain of salt in the alternate timeline). They may drink slightly more frequently, but the less they do when they do on average. For earlier grades, the difference is practically negligible. And differences in cannabis use rates are also practically negligible in all grades, while tobacco and nicotine use rates are actually lower in the alternate timeline.
- And no, there is NO practical difference in "liquid lunches" among high school students between the two timelines. By now, the drinking age (regardless of what it is) is VERY strictly enforced in that regard, and K-12 school grounds are strictly "dry" for all ages. (This is still the USA, not Denmark, after all!)
- Unfortunately, the COVID pandemic still happens, and so do the lockdowns and related restrictions. But such restrictions generally tend to be somewhat briefer and somewhat less extreme in the alternate timeline, as America has still not been quite as affected by "safetyism" as in the current timeline. Not much change either way in the case and death rates regardless, though. Turns out, as the saying goes, virus gonna virus, and humans gonna human.
- And in the alternate timeline, since the 1980s we as a society have clearly fallen out of love with the "illusion of control", to the extent that we ever even really loved it at all. That has got to be the single most defining feature that differs between the two timelines.
- Traffic death rates, both alcohol-related and otherwise, are actually rather lower in the alternate timeline compared to the current one, both among youth and adults alike. And the relative decrease in feelings of alienation and loneliness among younger people leads to at least somewhat fewer suicides and mass shootings as well.
- While Donald Trump still most likely gets elected President in 2016*, in 2024 he ends up narrowly losing to Kamala Harris instead of narrowly winning, both by popular vote as well as the Electoral College. That is because America's loneliness epidemic and feelings of alienation among younger Americans, especially young men, while still persistent, is at least marginally less pronounced in the alternate timeline, and the fence-sitters were less likely to be swayed towards Trump. (And Trump's second failed coup attempt in January 2025 fails even more than it did on January 6th, 2021, as he is largely greeted by crickets this time around, and he ultimately ends up in prison where he belongs.) It turns out the age-segregation effects of the 21 drinking age (and its ancillary laws and policies) in the current timeline were much more far-reaching than anyone could have predicted.
- And the rest is history. And the beat goes on.....
Tuesday, May 13, 2025
Alternate History Of The Legal Drinking Age (Part Deux)
In a previous post, we explored what an alternate timeline would have looked like if the drinking age was NOT raised to 21 in the 1980s. The most critical point in preventing that from happening in that timeline was Michigan (the first domino) NOT raising it to 21 in 1978. And the result? The Overton window did NOT shift in favor of 21, and with most states choosing to keep it at 18 or 19 depending on the state, the feds did NOT force or coerced and states to raise their drinking ages. If anything, the feds used positive reinforcement to get the Dirty Dozen states that were 21 since the 1930s and 1940s to lower their drinking ages, and by the end of the 1980s, all states except Utah were either 18 or 19 depending on the state. Some states had a split 18/19 age limit for different beverage types (i.e. beer vs wine vs liquor), while some others had a split 18/19 age limit for on-premise vs. off-premise purchases, or more often, limits on quantities and/or hours of sale for off-premise purchases if under 19, but otherwise set at 18. The most common was states who set it at 18 across the board, but allowed "local option" to set it 19 for off-premise purchases and/or quantity limits, though some of the 18 states chose to preempt even that on principle. (The higher age limit in states with graduated age limits was often called the "No Trickle-Down Law" or the "No Gray Market Law".)
A few states chose to keep it (or raise it to) 20 or 21 for very large quantities (kegs or multiple cases or multiple handles bought in the same transaction or same day), but those states were in the minority.
Even Utah, the strictest state of all for obvious reasons, held their collective noses and grudgingly lowered their drinking age to 19 for weak beer and 21 for everything else by 1990, and then briefly 19/20, then finally a flat 19 across the board (except kegs) sometime during the 1990s. Though they still retained their other bizarre and Byzantine liquor laws all the same in both timelines, of course.
So what would the 2020s look like in greater detail in this alternate timeline of events?
And America shall once again become the "shining city on a hill" that we were meant to be all along. An America to be truly proud of. If only we were in that alternate timeline.
*P.S. Ideally the DNC would NOT have totally screwed over Bernie Sanders, and he could have beaten Trump in 2016. That, and the Democratic Party establishment would not have eaten its young either. After all, Trump was literally supposed to lose, by design. But that, of course, would have probably been yet another alternate timeline, albeit one that is largely the same as the one discussed above, but perhaps with a few more subtle differences added on.
P.P.S. Of course, had Jimmy Carter been re-elected in 1980 instead of Reagan, America would now REALLY be more like Canada in so many ways, only better, having dodged the very worst of neoliberalism and all of that nonsense. And Carter could have pulled it off had he not screwed up in the presidential debate less than two weeks before the election, as he was well ahead in the polls just before the debate. But it was far more parsimonious to simply leave the 1980 election unchanged in the above alternate timeline, with Reagan as the winner, so as to isolate the drinking age as the variable of interest, unconfounded by that very pivotal and fateful election. Regardless, had Michigan failed to raise the drinking age to 21 in 1978, either way, it would have been extremely unlikely that either Reagan or Carter would have ever been swayed (let alone gung-ho) in that direction.
Labels:
Alternate history,
alternate universe,
multiverse,
retcon
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good work. What do you think would happen to all those countries in Asia with drinking ages higher than 18 in this timeline? Could they also be influenced by America having a drinking age of 18? Consider Dubai (21), India (high as 25 in some states), Thailand (20),
ReplyDeleteKazakhstan (21) and Indonesia (21) in our timeline.
Thank you very much. I would think that at least some, if not nearly all, of those countries and states would have lowered their drinking ages to 18 (or maybe 19 as a compromise in some places perhaps) in the alternate timeline due to America's influence. Some would not, of course. But more likely than not, I think, even if done belatedly.
DeleteAnother country I neglected to mention: Iceland, currently 20. I think they would have lowered it to 18 in the late 1980s (right around when they legalized real beer in 1989) or early 1990s at the latest when it wasn't really enforced, and before their moral panic about teen drinking the and Icelandic Prevention Model (Google it) began in earnest in the early 2000s. And the lower drinking age would have likely been sold as a way to "ensure stricter enforcement".
Also, and instead of waiting until 1999 to lower it from 20 to 18 like in the current timeline, New Zealand would have likely lowered it ten years earlier when they liberalized alcohol in general.
DeleteThanks. Given how much alcohol costs in Iceland, you wonder who could afford it anyway. Beer seems to have remained something of an expensive luxury even after it was legalised in 1989.
DeleteIndeed. It is ridiculously expensive over there.
DeleteI just made some updates now
ReplyDeleteSorry, I can't find them.
DeleteThey are small and subtle ones in the middle, such as the one about frats.
DeleteOkay, sorry.
DeleteNo problem
DeleteI added some more updates at the end as well now.
ReplyDelete