Better late than never, but honestly, what the hell took them so long?
THIS is what more states need to be doing. Legalize cannabis, keep vaping legal in general, but regulate better and root out any bad actors in the legitimate market, while cracking down on any remaining illicit market that continues to hawk questionable wares. In contrast, broad vaping or flavor bans, as well as cannabis prohibition and/or age limits set higher than 18, will only drive more customers to the black market, essentially pouring gasoline on the fire. And those who foolishly opted for the later strategy while dithering over the real cause now have the blood of over 2000 Americans on their hands.
Of course, Vitamin E Acetate may not be the only culprit. Other additives may also be to blame, as can perhaps the toxic cadmium fumes from cheaply-made and janky vaping devices and cartridges often made overseas (which can also be true for counterfeit nicotine vapes too, by the way). And possibly pesticide contamination as well. But again, in any case regulation would still work far better than prohibition to really get to the root of the problem.
Of course, Vitamin E Acetate may not be the only culprit. Other additives may also be to blame, as can perhaps the toxic cadmium fumes from cheaply-made and janky vaping devices and cartridges often made overseas (which can also be true for counterfeit nicotine vapes too, by the way). And possibly pesticide contamination as well. But again, in any case regulation would still work far better than prohibition to really get to the root of the problem.
As for the youth vaping epidemic driven by nicotine vapes, which is often disingenuously conflated with the mystery vaping illness, the best way to quash that is to raise the tax on nicotine-containing vape products, cap and phase-down the nicotine content of vape products down to European and Israeli levels, strictly enforce the existing age limit of 18 on vendors rather than raise it to 21, restrict vape advertising to be similar to the way it currently is for combustible tobacco products, and stop hyping this ridiculous moral panic so damn much for once.
So what are we waiting for?
It's a good thing that JUUL has been sued by the Attorney General of California. The Attorney General there knows that JUUL intentionally advertised to people under 18 as well as the flavors used to target this demographic group. JUUL then goes onto support a vaping age of 21 to deceive people of its past intentions. This is all very deceptive but companies such as this deserve strengthened regulation. Vaping devices should be heavily taxed with advertisement for these products prohibited. Notice that commercials for vaping devices appear even on radio and on TV. Those commercials are no different than how cigarettes were advertised in the 1940s.
ReplyDelete