It has been three decades since the last state, Wyoming, raised their legal drinking age to 21 in 1988 under federal duress. And since then, has it really led our culture to a healthier relationship with alcohol? Hardly. As Twenty-One Debunked has been noting for years now, the tragic truth is that Americans are drowning at the bottom of the bottle, and paying a heavy price for it. It is the "pink elephant in the room" that no one wants to talk about, particularly for Americans over 21. This despite the fact that alcohol continues to literally kill more people than the opioid epidemic, and yet the former has not been declared anywhere near a public health emergency the way the latter has been. Gee, I wonder why?
And while teen drinking is currently at a record low (though not unique to the USA, so don't be so quick to give credit to the 21 drinking age), adult drinking is anything but. What is most striking is how ageist (and cowardly) our culture's response has been to this epidemic of excessive drinking, essentially blaming young people for adult drinking problems.
As for what the most effective responses to America's drinking problem, the one that stands out as the lowest-hanging fruit of all in terms of both effectiveness and cost-effectiveness at reducing harm is raising alcohol taxes. In fact a recent international study of 16 countries by researchers at the World Health Orgainzation (WHO) confirmed what we have basically known all along but for some reason have yet to implement fully despite reams and reams of research evidence supporting it. Other close contenders in terms of the most "bang for the buck" include restrictions on alcohol advertising/marketing and hours of sale, but higher alcohol taxes/prices emerge as the most cost-effective measure of them all. Somewhat less cost-effective is tougher enforcement of BAC limits for DUI, but it is still highly effective as well. And the least cost-effective, but still effective (and worth doing) albeit more expensive, measure is screening and brief intervention for alcohol problems by primary-care physicians.
And guess what was not mentioned at all? You guessed it: drinking age laws. And for good reason: the supposed "mountain" of evidence in favor of the 21 drinking age basically turned out to be a molehill all along, and a very shaky one at that. But as an avid reader of Twenty-One Debunked, you already knew that, right? One day we will all look at the pro-21 crowd the same way we do for flat-earthers and such.
So yes, we do need to implement these aformentioned measures, especially raising alcohol taxes. Currently, in real dollars, alcohol is cheaper than ever in the USA. Raising and equalizing all federal alcohol taxes to $24 per proof-gallon (i.e. the inflation-adjusted 1991 level for distilled spirits) would be a good idea, though even raising them to $16 per proof-gallon would still yield very large societal benefits as well. That would not be much of a price hike to a moderate drinker, but to a heavy drinker it certainly would be.
And lowering the drinking age to 18 while implementing better and more honest alcohol education would most likely, at least over time, lead to a culturally healthier relationship with alcohol as well since it would no longer be a fetishized "forbidden fruit" that fosters a "go big or go home" attitude to drinking. The status quo certainly hasn't helped America's drinking culture one bit.
Let America be America Again, and lower the drinking age to 18. If you're old enough to go to war, you're old enough to go ot the bar. 'Nuff said.
The United States is an ageist and oppressive society. It is a society that refuses to listen to reason or to rational ideas. The drinking age of 21 is tyranny that has not, is not and will never improve alcohol responsibility in the U.S. As said here, prices for alcoholic beverages should be increased, advertising be restricted and the drinking age lowered to 18. The U.S. blames young people for alcohol problems but in reality, it's not young people. This country's culture of cowardice and of oppression is a disgrace.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, it is a national disgrace.
ReplyDeleteJust as bad is the general cowardice in confronting these truths. It's as if the United States was founded on the premise of oppressing young people. The premise of freedom has been completely forgotten or is lip service.
Delete