Wednesday, December 27, 2017
Would A Price Floor for Alcohol Be A Good Idea?
With the issue of alcohol taxes now coming to the forefront lately, there is also another policy measure designed to reduce the problems and externalities associated with excessive consumption of alcohol: minimum unit pricing. That is, a setting a minimum price per standard unit* of alcohol, which like excise taxes would increase the price of the cheap stuff (that is favored by heavy drinkers) but unlike taxes would have no effect on beverages whose price is already higher than the new minimum. After all, the effect of taxes operates through the mechanism of higher prices, so the public health benefits should be similar for both taxes and a price floor, or some combination of the two. The biggest differences would be in efficiency (who bears the costs) versus revenue (who gets it)--though even for taxes alone, the largest effect size, at the margins, would be on the heaviest drinkers as well, for obvious reasons.
One can see the effects of a price floor on both cheap alcohol in general as well as in bulk quantities. Take a 40 oz. bottle of 8% ABV malt liquor that now costs $2.99. That contains a whopping 5.3 standard American drinks*. If the price floor was then set at $0.75 per standard drink, for example, the price would go up to $3.99, a small but significant jump that really would add up for a heavy (and/or very young) drinker. A six-pack of 12 oz. cans of say, Budweiser (5% ABV) that sells for $5.99 per six-pack, already above that hypothetical price floor at $1.00 per standard drink--and that is a low-ball price for a six-pack in the USA--would be unaffected. A 12-pack of the same product selling for $9.99 would still be unaffected, and an 18-pack could be sold for as little as $13.50. But that 30-pack now on sale for $14.99? Well, the price for that would go up to $22.50. And that 15.5 gallon keg that currently sells for $100 or less, excluding deposit? Well, that contains about 168 standard drinks, so the minimum price for that would jump to $126 per keg. And those prices for bulk quantities would really add up for anyone who frequently throws or attends keggers or other large drinking parties--leading to somewhat fewer such occasions and/or less beer to go around at such parties. And now combine that with even a modest tax hike and you get a marginal effect size that is greater than either measure alone.
What about the hard stuff? Well, we see that while most of it would remain unafffected by a price floor, the cheaper end of the scale would be nonetheless be affected as well in a similar manner to beer. Take a "handle" (i.e. a 1.75 L bottle) of the cheapest vodka, whiskey, or whatever that currently costs $12.99 in some places. That contains about 40 shots of 1.5 oz each, so at 80 proof that would equal roughly 40 standard drinks per bottle. If the minimum price were set at $0.75 per standard drink, that bottle would now cost about $30. Even a mere $0.50 per drink floor price would raise the price of the cheap booze to around $20 or so. So while distilled spirits would be the least affected category overall, they would in fact be even more affected than beer at the lower end. And this would also lesssen the yawning disparity between on- and off-premise prices, thus reducing the urge to "pre-load" or "front-load" with cheap booze before going out to the bar, pub, or club.
So yes, Twenty-One Debunked would be fine with a price floor of $0.75 per standard drink, just as we would be fine with raising alcohol taxes across the board to as high as $24/proof-gallon for all beverage types. A combination of both would also be good as well. Given how moderate and responsible drinkers would barely be affected at all by either measure as noted (as long as the thresholds are not set much higher than the ones above), they hardly qualify as blunt instruments and are in fact highly efficient in practice. That's a small price to pay for liberty.
* One "standard American drink" or "standard unit" of alcohol is equal to one measure of the following: one 12 ounce can/mug/glass of beer at 5% ABV, one 5 ounce glass of wine at 12% ABV, or one 1.5 ounce shot of distilled spirits at 80 proof (40% ABV). This is known as alcohol equivalence. Contrary to popular opinion, these all contain the same amount of alcohol. So keep this in mind if or when you drink.
One can see the effects of a price floor on both cheap alcohol in general as well as in bulk quantities. Take a 40 oz. bottle of 8% ABV malt liquor that now costs $2.99. That contains a whopping 5.3 standard American drinks*. If the price floor was then set at $0.75 per standard drink, for example, the price would go up to $3.99, a small but significant jump that really would add up for a heavy (and/or very young) drinker. A six-pack of 12 oz. cans of say, Budweiser (5% ABV) that sells for $5.99 per six-pack, already above that hypothetical price floor at $1.00 per standard drink--and that is a low-ball price for a six-pack in the USA--would be unaffected. A 12-pack of the same product selling for $9.99 would still be unaffected, and an 18-pack could be sold for as little as $13.50. But that 30-pack now on sale for $14.99? Well, the price for that would go up to $22.50. And that 15.5 gallon keg that currently sells for $100 or less, excluding deposit? Well, that contains about 168 standard drinks, so the minimum price for that would jump to $126 per keg. And those prices for bulk quantities would really add up for anyone who frequently throws or attends keggers or other large drinking parties--leading to somewhat fewer such occasions and/or less beer to go around at such parties. And now combine that with even a modest tax hike and you get a marginal effect size that is greater than either measure alone.
What about the hard stuff? Well, we see that while most of it would remain unafffected by a price floor, the cheaper end of the scale would be nonetheless be affected as well in a similar manner to beer. Take a "handle" (i.e. a 1.75 L bottle) of the cheapest vodka, whiskey, or whatever that currently costs $12.99 in some places. That contains about 40 shots of 1.5 oz each, so at 80 proof that would equal roughly 40 standard drinks per bottle. If the minimum price were set at $0.75 per standard drink, that bottle would now cost about $30. Even a mere $0.50 per drink floor price would raise the price of the cheap booze to around $20 or so. So while distilled spirits would be the least affected category overall, they would in fact be even more affected than beer at the lower end. And this would also lesssen the yawning disparity between on- and off-premise prices, thus reducing the urge to "pre-load" or "front-load" with cheap booze before going out to the bar, pub, or club.
So yes, Twenty-One Debunked would be fine with a price floor of $0.75 per standard drink, just as we would be fine with raising alcohol taxes across the board to as high as $24/proof-gallon for all beverage types. A combination of both would also be good as well. Given how moderate and responsible drinkers would barely be affected at all by either measure as noted (as long as the thresholds are not set much higher than the ones above), they hardly qualify as blunt instruments and are in fact highly efficient in practice. That's a small price to pay for liberty.
* One "standard American drink" or "standard unit" of alcohol is equal to one measure of the following: one 12 ounce can/mug/glass of beer at 5% ABV, one 5 ounce glass of wine at 12% ABV, or one 1.5 ounce shot of distilled spirits at 80 proof (40% ABV). This is known as alcohol equivalence. Contrary to popular opinion, these all contain the same amount of alcohol. So keep this in mind if or when you drink.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment