- Keeping the Zero Tolerance DUI Law age limit at 21, and/or for the first X number of years of having a license. (Puerto Rico, many Canadian provinces, Germany, and many other countries currently do so despite a drinking age of 18 or even lower.)
- Strictly enforcing the new, lowered drinking age of 18, especially against vendors and those who otherwise furnish alcohol to people under 18.
- Keeping the purchase age at 19, 20, or 21 for kegs, cases, handles of liquor, and other large quantities, and/or limiting the quantities and number of transactions per day for people aged 18-20.
- Having shorter trading hours for people under 21.
- Lowering the drinking or purchase age to 18 for beer and/or wine, but keeping it 20 or 21 for hard liquor.
- Lowering the general drinking age to 18, and the and purchase age to 18 for on-premise sales (bars and restaurants), but keeping the purchase age at 21 (or 20 or 19 perhaps) for off-premise sales from stores. Or allowing off-premise sales to 18 year olds only if one is with someone over the higher age.
- Lowering the general drinking or purchase age to 19 or 20, but waiting longer to lower it all the way to 18.
- Having exceptions to the any of the higher drinking or purchase ages for those with a college or military ID.
- For on-premise sales, not accepting out of state IDs from people under a neighboring state's drinking age if within X number of miles from the border.
- Requiring a "drinking license" for 18-20 year olds similar to that advocated by Choose Responsibility.
Friday, April 4, 2025
The Pitfalls Of "Ersatz 21"
Wednesday, April 2, 2025
The Law Of Eristic Escalation Revisited
Or, "Politics In One Lesson"
There is an eternal law of nature that at once explains just about everything, and even makes politics possible to finally understand. It is called The Law of Eristic Escalation:
Imposition of Order = Escalation of Chaos
By that, it pertains to any arbitrary or coercive imposition of order, which at least in the long run, actually causes disorder (chaos) to escalate. Fenderson's Amendment further adds that "the tighter the order in question is maintained, the longer the consequent chaos takes to escalate, BUT the more it does when it does." Finally, the Thudthwacker Addendum still further adds that this relationship is nonlinear, thus rendering the resulting escalation of chaos completely unpredictable in terms of the original imposition of order.
We see the real world consequences of this in everything from Prohibition to the War on (people who use a few particular) Drugs to zero tolerance policies to Covid lockdowns to sexual repression and so much more. And, of course, especially in the ageist abomination that is the 21 drinking age. Any short-term benefits that these arbitrary and coercive impositions of order may provide is entirely outweighed when they inevitably backfire in the long run. Miron and Tetelbaum (2009), Asch and Levy (1987 and 1990), and Males (1986), etc. illustrate this very nicely in the case of the 21 drinking age.
Perhaps that is why most bans on various things have historically had a track record that is quite lackluster at best. Ironically, bans tend to give more power to the very things that they seek to ban.
And now, ladies and gentlemen, you finally understand politics.
P.S. The Dutch seem to understand this better. They even have a proverb: "when you permit, you control", which is the antithesis of the American proverb, "when you permit, you promote". Carl Jung would also likely have a field day with that as well.