Saturday, June 3, 2017

The Dark Side of the Icelandic Model

Recently, we posted an article about the seemingly successful Youth in Iceland strategy for reducing teen substance abuse. To wit, since 1997, the consumption of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and other substances among 15-16 year olds has plummeted theremore so than any other nation, according to surveys.  And in fact, by 2016, Iceland was able to boast having the cleanest-living teens in the industrialized world, in contrast from being home to Europe's heaviest-drinking teens twenty years ago.

This was done through a combination of things: 1) laws were changed to raise the age of majority from 16 to 18, raise the smoking age for tobacco to 18 and the drinking age to 20, and set a 10 pm curfew law for people under 16, 2) most parents pledging to basically close ranks and keep their kids on a fairly tight leash overall, at least by European standards, and 3) the government investing in providing sports and other recreational activities for young people to give them something to do as a healthy alternative to drugs or alcohol.   And while not explicitly considered a part of the strategy, Iceland's very high alcohol taxes no doubt played a role as well.  We at Twenty-One Debunked noted how this strategy was a mixed bag and would support it if (and only if) it could be done without the ageism/adultism, like Kaunas, Lithuania (and some other cities) supposedly was able to do.

But one thing we did not look at right away was what happens when Icelandic youth finally do come of age.  The surveys used to support the Icelandic Prevention Model are of 15-16 year olds, but curiously the model's supporters don't even mention any data for people just a few years older.  Surely there should be a positive spillover or at least a cohort effect that follows youth exposed to the strategy if the ageists' theories are correct, so such a glaring omission is very curious indeed.

We think we know why.  For adults, Iceland is in fact one of the drunkest and druggiest countries in the world.  This is particularly true for prescription pills:  they seem to lead the world (or at least Europe) in the use/abuse of opioid painkillers, sedatives, tranquilizers, and stimulants.  And such drugs, particularly opioids, have been on the rise lately even as they have fallen in many other countries.  And despite fairly strict drug laws, the use of illicit drugs, both cannabis as well as hard drugs, have also increased significantly recent years as well. Iceland also notably leads the world in antidepressant use, and is also on the increase, which can be true for a number of reasons.   Though their overall per-capita alcohol consumption is below the OECD average, it has nonetheless risen 35% since 1992 despite recent alcohol tax hikes, and when they do drink, they really drink themselves into oblivion--kinda like stereotypical American college freshmen.  Of course, Iceland was already kind of like that before the Youth in Iceland strategy began in 1998, as well as for cohorts that came of age before that, but the fact that such widespread substance use/abuse has held steady or increased for the cohorts of adults that were affected by the law changes shows just how hollow the whole thing really was.

Oh, and for those who think that America's so-called "hook-up culture" among young people is out of control, well, let's just say that you've never been to Iceland.  And not just for young people either.  Over there it seems that "f**k first, names later" is the norm, often literally, and they are usually under the influence of alcohol when they do it.  Not to knock casual sex per se, or to shame anyone for it, but it is nonetheless sobering to note that Iceland leads Europe in terms of STD's, or at least chlamydia in particular, a disease that has even been nicknamed the "Reykjavik Handshake".  So apparently many Icelanders are getting so wasted that they fail to use condoms as directed, if at all, when they hook up.

In other words, the otherwise-progressive Iceland has basically become Little America in that regard, and not necessarily in a good way either.  That is what happens when ageists in power focus only on young people while ignoring the pink elephant in the room--the behavior of their elders.  The contrast between "abstain from everything" adolescence and "anything goes" adulthood couldn't be any more stark, and simply raising age limits or revoking civil rights from young people merely kicks the proverbial can down the road.  It's the Law of Eristic Escalation in action:  imposition of order leads to escalation of chaos/disorder, particularly if the order in question imposed is arbitrary and/or coercive. Renowned sociologist and youth-rights activist Mike Males would surely have a field day with Iceland!

2018 UPDATE:  A recent article has been written detailing the numbers of alcohol consumption in Iceland.  Also, we would be remiss if we did not note that the so-called "Reykjavik Handshake" was primarily the result of (largely imported) condoms becoming pricier and less affordable for young Icelanders after their currency devaluation in the wake of their financial crisis a decade ago, as opposed to a purported increase in boozy sex compared with the 1990s, which does not really seem to be true.

2020 UPDATE:  Apparently, Iceland's drinking age was never actually below 20 at any time since the repeal of alcohol prohibition.  It was set at 21 in 1935 upon repeal of prohhibiton, then lowered to 20 in 1968 and remained as such since then, as attempts to lower it to 18 have all failed.  Thus, the articles that claimed that raising the drinking age to 20 was part of Iceland's new prevention strategy are factually inaccurate.

8 comments:

  1. When the misbehavior of older people is tolerated while the behavior of girls and boys is scrutnized, then the results would be reminiscent of Iceland and the United States. Girls and boys see the behavior of older people as the model of life that is expected of themselves. For Iceland to advance in this regard then, older people should be scrutinized for for their behavior.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Amen to that! I couldn't have said it better myself. The prevailing attitude of "Do as I say, not as I do" is practically the definition of hypocrisy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. With the hypocrisy in both Iceland and in the U.S., positive results can't be reached. Girls and boys copy older people because that's what a society is organized around. There can't be an age separation to separate behaviors because that's not how societies work like.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Icebrat, I do apologize if I came across as a bit harsh on Iceland. As an American who has never been to Iceland nor has even met anyone from Iceland, all I know about Iceland is what I have read online.

    Indeed, there is a lot that I admire about your country. I absolutely love how you jailed the banksters instead of bailing them out. Bravo! I love how generally progressive and egalitarian your country is overall, especially in regards to gender equality. Bravo! And though I may have seemed to be sneering a bit in my article, I also admire your country's ethos of sexual liberation and lack of American-style prudery and puritanism. Bravo! We can certainly learn a lot from your country indeed.

    The harsh tone of my article, on the other hand, stems entirely from my stance as a lifelong youth-rights activist. I reflexively despise curfew laws and any drinking age laws higher than 18 or whatever the age of majority is, whichever is lower. I loathe adult hypocrisy. When I called Iceland "Little America", and not in a good way,I really meant that as a diss on my own country, and as a warning to NOT be like us. The USA has a lot of good qualities, to be sure, but we are very ageist and adults here (especially the Boomers) are very hypocritical. And we are quickly sliding down the slippery slope of fascism as we speak.

    As for alcohol, the tragic truth is that Americans are drowning at the bottom of the bottle, and paying a heavy price for it. It is the pink elephant in the room, basically. The 21 drinking age really does more harm than good.

    And also, as for the so-called "Reykjavik Handshake", I later learned that that was primarily due to the price of (largely) condoms going through the roof and becoming harder for young people to afford after Iceland's currency devaluation. As opposed to boozy sex being on the rise compared with the 1990s, which does not appear to be true.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The only advice I would give to Iceland is to 1) abolish the curfew law, and 2) lower the drinking age to 18. And perhaps hand out free condoms as well. Otherwise, us Yanks have a lot to learn from Iceland.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Another article finds that drinking among all ages has dropped from 2007 to 2014, though that can probably be attributed to the sharp hike in alcohol taxes following the 2008 financial crisis more than anything else. https://icelandmag.is/article/icelanders-consume-less-alcohol-now-they-did-2007

    ReplyDelete